Charlie Kirk devoted his public life to building a Christian-nationalist political culture that seeks to enshrine one religion as the norm and to pressure or erase those who do not conform. Through Turning Point USA and allied media he worked to undermine the dignity and safety of transgender and broader LGBTQ people, women seeking reproductive freedom, religious minorities including Jews and Muslims, immigrants, and people of color. His rhetoric and organizing helped pass laws and foster a social climate that predictably caused real, preventable deaths and attempted to erode the civil standing of anyone outside a narrow “white Christian nationalist” identity.
Kirk’s program was not new. It stood squarely in the American tradition of KKK terror, Jim Crow segregation, and the so-called blue laws that once forced Jewish merchants to close two days a week and punished anyone who would not live as a Sunday-observant Christian. Those systems of “legal respectability” achieved, without firing a shot, the same aim that Kirk pursued in our own century: to make non-Christians and sexual or gender minorities second-class citizens whose lives were shorter and harder. These outcomes were not accidental but the foreseeable and in significant measure, intended result of his campaigns, even when he avoided explicit calls for violence.
From a Jewish perspective, every human being is created b’tzelem Elohim (in the image of God). At the same time, halakhah recognizes the category of a rashaʿ (one who acts wickedly) and condemns those who mesit u-madiach (incite others to sin or harm), commit lifnei iver (place stumbling blocks), or become gorem harigah (a cause of bloodshed). Kirk’s sustained, deliberate influence fits these categories: he incited and enabled policies whose foreseeable effect was the loss of life and the attempted erasure of minority communities. While he was not a rodef (an immediate physical pursuer whose killing would be halakhically permitted) his actions amount to shefikhut damim, bloodshed that cannot be repaired.
Therefore I neither gloat nor mourn. I refrain from mockery or desecration, but I cannot call it a tragedy when a life devoted to diminishing, endangering, and erasing others has ended. The most truthful and Jewishly faithful response is unsparing accounting of the harm, gratitude that his capacity to inflict it has ceased, and redoubled commitment to protect those he sought to harm and to dismantle the Christian-nationalist ideology and the long American lineage of KKK, Jim Crow, and blue-law oppression that he worked to revive.
No comments:
Post a Comment